PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews
> "Devine, James" wrote:
>
> Sabri writes: >I agree with this in the sense that it is better to
> call social sciences "social thought".<
>
> in middle school (a.k.a., "Junior High"), they call it "social
> studies." That makes sense.
I believe this gives too much "credit" as it were to physics. I think
biology would be preferable to physics as the "archetypal" science. Then
it would make as much sense to call political economy or history science
as physics.
Carrol
> Jim
- Thread context:
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, (continued)
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews,
Sabri Oncu Thu 12 Jun 2003, 10:41 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews,
dsquared Thu 12 Jun 2003, 13:50 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews,
Devine, James Thu 12 Jun 2003, 13:56 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews,
Devine, James Thu 12 Jun 2003, 14:03 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews,
dsquared Thu 12 Jun 2003, 14:25 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]