No, I'm more fishy than that.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Perelman
To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 6/12/2003 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews
Jim D. must be a Libra.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:02:45AM -0700, Devine, James wrote:
>
> the predictions of astrology are too vague to be tested or falsified.
> (They're much vaguer than those of Milton Friedman's codification of
> monetarism, for example, which currently is seen as largely falsified
by
> mainstream macroeconomics.) A real test would be to reverse the normal
> astrological process, predicting one's birthday -- or, easier, one's
sign --
> based on personality tests and the like. (No google searches allowed.)
>
> Jim
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, (continued)
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, Devine, James Thu 12 Jun 2003, 14:03 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, Michael Perelman Thu 12 Jun 2003, 14:19 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, Shane Mage Thu 12 Jun 2003, 14:50 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, dsquared Thu 12 Jun 2003, 14:25 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, Devine, James Thu 12 Jun 2003, 14:26 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, Devine, James Thu 12 Jun 2003, 14:41 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, andie nachgeborenen Thu 12 Jun 2003, 15:33 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, ravi Thu 12 Jun 2003, 16:05 GMT
- Re: Skewering stilted language and theory: F. Crews, Carrol Cox Thu 12 Jun 2003, 18:00 GMT