PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Subject: Double taxation
For brief clarity to your neighbor: corporations have all the rights of
people without their responsibilities. Mainstream pols and pundits use the
term personal responsibility to gut social spending and back the market.
Invert the term to clear the fog from above. PR, indeed!
Seth Sandronsky
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:06:38 -0500
From: Bill Lear <rael@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Double taxation
In today's NY Times, Paul Krugman writes:
Less attention has been paid to fine print that reveals the
supposed rationale for the dividend tax cut as a smoke
screen. The problem, we were told, is that profits are taxed
twice: once when they are earned, a second time when they are
paid out as dividends. But as any tax expert will tell you, the
corporate tax law is full of loopholes; many profitable
corporations pay little or no taxes.
Notice the contrarian coda. Why not one that flatly contradicts the
lie, as Dean Baker does here (Economic Reporting Review, May 27, 2003):
All corporate income is already taxed only once. Income that
corporations pay out to individuals, such as their workers and
shareholders, is subject to taxation, but income at the corporate
level is only taxed once. The tax at the corporate level is
optional, in the sense that if shareholders believed that the
benefits granted by the government to corporations did not
outweigh the burden of the corporate tax, they would reform the
corporation as a partnership. The fact that they voluntarily
choose to structure their business as a corporation means that
they think the benefits exceed the cost of the tax.
or here (Economic Reporting Review, May 19, 2003):
Corporations and individuals are distinct legal entities, who
each pay tax on their income only once.
This legal distinction is extremely important. The government
grants many valuable privileges to corporations, most importantly
limited liability, that a group of unincorporated individuals do
not have. The value of these privileges is proven by the fact
that individuals voluntarily create corporations, knowing that
income will be taxed at the corporate level. In this sense, the
corporate tax is entirely voluntary -- if individuals felt that
the privileges the government grants to corporations did not
outweigh the cost of the tax, then they would form partnerships
and avoid the corporate tax altogether.
Bill
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
- Thread context:
- Fetishizing the Zapatistas: a critique of "Change the World Without Taking Power",
Louis Proyect Sat 07 Jun 2003, 20:16 GMT
- A Faustian bargain? Iraq for Congo?,
Hari Kumar Sat 07 Jun 2003, 16:27 GMT
- Apology to list for this private note to Ravi,
Hari Kumar Sat 07 Jun 2003, 14:44 GMT
- Re: Subject: Double taxation,
Seth Sandronsky Sat 07 Jun 2003, 14:18 GMT
- India, Israel & the US,
Ian Murray Sat 07 Jun 2003, 04:04 GMT
- Iraqi groups getting their act together?,
k hanly Sat 07 Jun 2003, 01:00 GMT
- National Missile Defence: Good for Canadian Businees,
k hanly Fri 06 Jun 2003, 20:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]