Re: [Fwd: The Bush Family and the Nazis]

[Kenneth Campbell <kkc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Carrol Cox wrote:

>The Book isn't worth the Candle, or however the old saying goes.
>No one is going to be particularly influenced by this
>information on Prescott Bush, so by quoting a Larouche site we
>gain nothing but give more respectability to one of our enemies.

I agree with Carrol entirely about sources.

(And Carrol doesn't seem to disagree with the factual points, but
"referencing" it.)

One of the best ways to tarnish a "side" is to have people like Larouche
referenced.

I doubt a LL publication has original documents -- the stuff I've seen,
at least -- so they can usually be found elsewhere.

(That's an old trick used in news media; like the point, but hate the
speaker? Find someone else who will say it.)

I've seen the same sort of thing before, where, for instance, Ernst
Zundel material is quoted by "leftists" about the foundation of Israel.

Even mentioning that shite does more damage than good...

Ken.

--
It would be equally reasonable to say that sheep are
born carnivorous, and everywhere nibble grass.
          -- Émile Faguet
             Summarising Joseph de Maistre’s response
             to the first sentence of Rousseau’s
             "Social Contract"