At 2003-05-31 16:25 -0400, Louis Proyect wrote
I didn't say that you didn't believe in the centrality of the working class. I only said that you thought that trying to make working class revolutions modeled on October 1917 would backfire.
Isn't that a fairly common position among activists and scholars in the Marxist tradition who favor a non-sectarian and non-dogmatic approach?
Chris Burford
- Waxman v. Rummy, Ian Murray Sat 31 May 2003, 20:24 GMT
- Brit sex torture of Iraqis, Chris Burford Sat 31 May 2003, 17:29 GMT
- Foster-Panitch debate on the relevance of "imperialism", Louis Proyect Sat 31 May 2003, 16:49 GMT
- Message not available
- Feedback from Leo Panitch, plus my reply, Louis Proyect Sat 31 May 2003, 20:24 GMT
- Re: Feedback from Leo Panitch, plus my reply, Chris Burford Sun 01 Jun 2003, 22:46 GMT
- Re: Feedback from Leo Panitch, plus my reply, Michael Perelman Sun 01 Jun 2003, 23:00 GMT
- Re: Feedback from Leo Panitch, plus my reply, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 01 Jun 2003, 23:14 GMT
- Re: Foster-Panitch debate on the relevance of "imperialism", Chris Burford Sat 31 May 2003, 21:09 GMT
- More on Halliburton and Pawning Iraq's oil, k hanly Sat 31 May 2003, 15:46 GMT