<<I would define "rent seeking" as involving individual seeking of special advantages in competition, in order to get a larger share of the profit pie. This does NOT just involve lobbying, contrary to the Chicago/Virginia school of economics. For example, my grocery store (Safeway) gave me a special card that, when I use it, automatically gives me a discount on some products. This is an effort to bind me to the company -- since I can't use the card at other stores -- to seek special competitive advantages. This is pretty harmless, but there are lots of other examples. >>
This encapsulates the exact problem I am trying to address. You acknowledge that there exists a recognizable behavior of lobbying to obtain profits, and you acknowledge that there exists a separate recognizable behavior of issuing coupons intended to obtain profits You and I agree that both behaviors can be characterized as attempts to obtain profits. However, you want to also call both behaviors "rent-seeking." Fine, call issuing coupons "rent-seeking" if you want. But what name do you want to give lobbying to obtain profits to distinguish it from issuing coupons to obtain profits?
David Shemano
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, (continued)
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Carrol Cox Sat 31 May 2003, 16:23 GMT
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 31 May 2003, 17:22 GMT
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Devine, James Sat 31 May 2003, 00:08 GMT
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Ian Murray Sat 31 May 2003, 00:40 GMT
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, David S. Shemano Sat 31 May 2003, 00:16 GMT
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Ian Murray Sat 31 May 2003, 00:34 GMT
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Sabri Oncu Sat 31 May 2003, 01:32 GMT
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Kenneth Campbell Sat 31 May 2003, 01:43 GMT
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Sabri Oncu Sat 31 May 2003, 02:33 GMT