Re: pen-l masochism revisited

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: pen-l masochism revisited
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:53:09 -0400

Michael Perelman wrote:

Free-trade agreements more than a few paragraphs long are not credible.
Of course, with the United States wants is not free-trade in imports, but
free-trade in exports.


Wal-Mart loves free trade in imports. Who is this "United States," anyway?

Doug

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited
  - From: Carrol Cox

References:
- pen-l masochism revisited
  - From: Devine, James
- Re: pen-l masochism revisited
  - From: Michael Perelman

Prev by Date: Re: Public/Private
Next by Date: Re: pen-l masochism revisited
Previous by thread: Re: pen-l masochism revisited
Next by thread: Re: pen-l masochism revisited
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- pen-l masochism revisited, Devine, James Fri 30 May 2003, 22:33 GMT
  - Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Ian Murray Fri 30 May 2003, 22:55 GMT
  - Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Michael Perelman Fri 30 May 2003, 23:19 GMT
    - Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Ian Murray Fri 30 May 2003, 23:36 GMT
    - Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Doug Henwood Fri 30 May 2003, 23:53 GMT
      
      Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Carrol Cox Sat 31 May 2003, 16:23 GMT
      
      Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 31 May 2003, 17:22 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Devine, James Sat 31 May 2003, 00:08 GMT
    - Re: pen-l masochism revisited, Ian Murray Sat 31 May 2003, 00:40 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]