Re: Public/Private

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Public/Private
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 18:08:10 -0400

David S. Shemano wrote:

To me, rent-seeking is the attempt to increase profitability through
the lobbying of the state.


What about Microsoft's monopoly rents? The state has made them
possible through IP laws, but those are universally applicable; MSFT
has no special legal status.

Doug

References:
- Re: Public/Private
  - From: David S. Shemano

Prev by Date: Re: Public/private
Next by Date: Re: Public/private
Previous by thread: Re: Public/Private
Next by thread: Re: Public/Private
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- public/private, (continued)
  - public/private, Forstater, Mathew Fri 30 May 2003, 21:52 GMT
  - Public/private, Forstater, Mathew Fri 30 May 2003, 21:58 GMT
    - Re: Public/private, Doug Henwood Fri 30 May 2003, 22:06 GMT
  - Re: Public/Private, David S. Shemano Fri 30 May 2003, 22:02 GMT
    - Re: Public/Private, Doug Henwood Fri 30 May 2003, 22:08 GMT
    - Re: Public/Private, Ian Murray Fri 30 May 2003, 22:25 GMT
      
      Re: Public/Private, Kenneth Campbell Fri 30 May 2003, 23:10 GMT
      
      Re: Public/Private, Ian Murray Fri 30 May 2003, 23:34 GMT
      
      Re: Public/Private, Kenneth Campbell Fri 30 May 2003, 23:43 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]