|
The ideas of
the Free Trade movement are based on a theoretical error whose practical origin
is not hard to identify; they are based on a distinction between political
society and civil society, which is made into and presented as an organic one,
whereas in fact it is merely methodological. Thus it is asserted that economic
activity belongs to civil society, and that the State must not intervene to
regulate it. But since in actual reality civil society and State are one and
the same, it must be made clear that laissez-faire
too is a form of State “regulation”, introduced and maintained by
legislative and coercive means. It is a deliberate policy, conscious of its own
ends, and not the spontaneous, automatic _expression_ of economic facts. (Gramsci) |
- Re: Fair Trade Coffee, (continued)
- Re: Fair Trade Coffee, Peter Dorman Fri 30 May 2003, 23:10 GMT
- Re: Fair Trade Coffee, Michael Perelman Sat 31 May 2003, 02:54 GMT
- What happened to Europe versus America?, Louis Proyect Fri 30 May 2003, 17:44 GMT
- Re: What happened to Europe versus America?, Chris Burford Sat 31 May 2003, 06:16 GMT
- Re: Public/Private, Forstater, Mathew Fri 30 May 2003, 17:04 GMT
- Re: Public/Private, Ian Murray Fri 30 May 2003, 17:06 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Public/Private, David S. Shemano Fri 30 May 2003, 19:24 GMT
- Re: Public/Private, Ian Murray Fri 30 May 2003, 20:35 GMT
- Re: Public/Private, Forstater, Mathew Fri 30 May 2003, 20:44 GMT