Maybe Ken was following the common sloppy usage of referring to either a state/command economy or a welfare state as "socialism."
------------------------
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hari Kumar [mailto:hari.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 4:12 PM
> To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PEN-L] "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????
>
>
> Re: free to market and plunder"; by k hanly:
> "A point not often made is that as in Yugoslavia one aim of regime
> change was to remove whatever elements of a socialist economy that
> remained. This was explicit in the agreement that Milosevic refused to
> sign. Now it is clear that any remnants of socialist command type
> economy in Iraq that might ration goods other than by dollars is to be
> destroyed."
> Comment:
> Come again? Coudl you specify such pelase?
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
- drug research bias, Ian Murray Fri 30 May 2003, 01:10 GMT
- "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????, Hari Kumar Thu 29 May 2003, 23:14 GMT
- Re: "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????, k hanly Fri 30 May 2003, 05:10 GMT
- Re: "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????, Chris Burford Fri 30 May 2003, 07:23 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????, Devine, James Thu 29 May 2003, 23:16 GMT
- Re: "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????, Hari Kumar Fri 30 May 2003, 11:48 GMT
- Re: "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????, Devine, James Fri 30 May 2003, 15:16 GMT
- Re: "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????, Ian Murray Fri 30 May 2003, 15:21 GMT
- Re: "Socialist command type economy in Iraq"????, Bill Lear Fri 30 May 2003, 15:32 GMT