PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[PEN-L:36315] Re: Spreading the cost, legitimizing aggression



The American invasion of Iraq is essentially a hostile takeover --
financing the acquisition of another country by liquidating the latter's
assets.  Truly government along modern business lines...

Peter

k hanly wrote:

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=3341


Aid Conundrum

by Phyllis Bennis; March 28, 2003



snip

Should oil-for-food funds be released and used to pay for emergency
supplies?

 No -- international law, specifically Geneva Conventions, requires
belligerent --and occupying power -- to take responsibility (meaning pay)
for humanitarian needs of civilian population under occupation. Currently
that includes most of Iraq. The oil-for-food money is Iraqi money; it
belongs to the people of Iraq, and should remain in the bank until there is
a functioning government in Iraq to whom it can be turned over.

2) Then how should emergency food, medicine, other needs be paid for? The
U.S., the occupying power and belligerent, should pay all costs for
emergency care and initial rehabilitation efforts, at least during period
while hostilities continue.


etc.




Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]