PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:36255] Re: Re: bunkerbusters
Some of them are nuclear. I just did not know if they had non-nukes.
Thanks.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 09:44:00PM -0600, k hanly wrote:
> No. They are conventional but with a lot of explosives.
>
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:36256] impeaching Bush,
michael perelman Sat 29 Mar 2003, 04:48 GMT
- [PEN-L:36253] WTO-deadlock approaching?,
Ian Murray Sat 29 Mar 2003, 02:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:36252] bunkerbusters,
Michael Perelman Sat 29 Mar 2003, 02:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:36251] Barron's on the effects of war...,
joanna bujes Sat 29 Mar 2003, 01:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:36250] Rumsfeld's enemies are circling - BBC,
Chris Burford Sat 29 Mar 2003, 00:47 GMT
- [PEN-L:36249] Guardian: more on Perle's fall,
Chris Burford Sat 29 Mar 2003, 00:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]