PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:36251] Barron's on the effects of war...
- To: lbo-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nucleus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jannuzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gcf@xxxxxxxxx, mmcintyr@xxxxxxxxxx, gadfly@xxxxxxxxxxxx, joanna@xxxxxxxxx, kdonna@xxxxxxxxx, dkmonaco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgrimes@xxxxxxxxx, ale_may@xxxxxxx, howarddickler@xxxxxx, bradley.mayer@xxxxxxx, joanna.bujes@xxxxxxx, Dana.Bergen@xxxxxxx, Marc.Kriguer@xxxxxxx, Thomas.Seay@xxxxxxx, howarddickler@xxxxxx, pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Francis.Upton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [PEN-L:36251] Barron's on the effects of war...
- From: joanna bujes <joanna.bujes@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:56:10 -0800
Barron's gives the war 4-8 weeks before we swing into a more serious
recession. Here's a snippet of what they emailed ALL their subscribers today:
"What's War Good For?
Already, the war is hurting the economy. If it drags on for more than 4-8
weeks, some economists say be prepared for a serious recession that's far
worse than the last one. Barron's takes a closer look at the outlook for the
economy and stocks - and the remaining unknowns."
...full story in tomorrow's edition. Finance capital does NOT like this war.
Joanna
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:36253] WTO-deadlock approaching?,
Ian Murray Sat 29 Mar 2003, 02:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:36252] bunkerbusters,
Michael Perelman Sat 29 Mar 2003, 02:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:36251] Barron's on the effects of war...,
joanna bujes Sat 29 Mar 2003, 01:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:36250] Rumsfeld's enemies are circling - BBC,
Chris Burford Sat 29 Mar 2003, 00:47 GMT
- [PEN-L:36249] Guardian: more on Perle's fall,
Chris Burford Sat 29 Mar 2003, 00:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:36248] RE: Re: Dixie Chick apologises,
Devine, James Fri 28 Mar 2003, 23:38 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]