PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:34239] Re: short vs. long-run contracts
Gill writes:
> If the paper Sabri refers to is the 1991 J. Ec. Theory
> paper by these three authors, the point of the Fudenberg
> et al. paper is a bit more specific, and correspondingly
> less silly, than Sabri's short summary would suggest.
I beg to differ Gill. As the abstract I chopped demonstrates,
what they did is even sillier than my short summary suggests.
I was just doing a favor to some fellow mathematicians, however
psuedo they may be, by not hanging their dirty laundry in the
open.
Best,
Sabri
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:34243] Global Financial System: BIS report on Credit Risk Transfer,
Sabri Oncu Fri 31 Jan 2003, 08:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:34242] oops,
Ian Murray Fri 31 Jan 2003, 06:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:34241] the Euro,
Ian Murray Fri 31 Jan 2003, 06:15 GMT
- [PEN-L:34240] Frontiers of Privatization,
michael perelman Fri 31 Jan 2003, 04:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:34239] Re: short vs. long-run contracts,
Sabri Oncu Fri 31 Jan 2003, 04:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:34237] technology spillover,
Ian Murray Fri 31 Jan 2003, 03:58 GMT
- [PEN-L:34234] RE: Re: short vs. long-run contracts,
Devine, James Fri 31 Jan 2003, 00:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]