PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:34175] Re: Re: the oil thing/overproduction
soula avramidis wrote:
>
>
>
> in other words aren't we
> too general by simply stating that the law of value holds? or should
> we be saying that it holds because when prices rose the high cost
> tarsands of northern canada came into production.
>
It depends on whether you see the law of value as primarily a theorem in
economics or primarily a theory about how under given historical
conditions human activity is regulated and organized. Perhaps it's both,
but it is _certainly_ the second, and the second is what is important
about it.
Carrol
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:34168] Re: Cointelpro, (continued)
- [PEN-L:34156] RE: corporatizing the national park service,
Devine, James Mon 27 Jan 2003, 15:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:34155] the oil thing/overproduction,
Waistline2 Mon 27 Jan 2003, 15:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:34154] Re: RE: UN constitutional crux on Iraq,
soula avramidis Mon 27 Jan 2003, 08:02 GMT
- [PEN-L:34153] corporatizing the national park service,
Ian Murray Mon 27 Jan 2003, 07:55 GMT
- [PEN-L:34152] the oil thingy,
Ian Murray Mon 27 Jan 2003, 07:24 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]