[PEN-L:33422] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke)

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PEN-L:33422] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke)
From: "Ellen Frank" <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:06:39 -0500

Thanks for the post Mat.  You couldn't make this stuff up!
Ellen


pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>http://www.mises.org/fullstory.asp?control=573&titlenum=&FS=&title=&Mont

References:
- [PEN-L:33378] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke)
  - From: Forstater, Mathew

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:33421] Too much PC
Next by Date: [PEN-L:33423] Re: Local Government Rejects Corporate Personhood
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:33378] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke)
Next by thread: [PEN-L:33379] RE: Re: RE: The Economist considers Karl Marx
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:33382] Re: Re: In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke), (continued)
  - [PEN-L:33382] Re: Re: In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke), Louis Proyect Tue 24 Dec 2002, 18:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:33380] RE: Re: The Economicst considers Karl Marx ref # 33 297, Devine, James Tue 24 Dec 2002, 18:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:33379] RE: Re: RE: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Devine, James Tue 24 Dec 2002, 17:58 GMT
- [PEN-L:33378] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke), Forstater, Mathew Tue 24 Dec 2002, 17:16 GMT
  - [PEN-L:33422] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke), Ellen Frank Thu 26 Dec 2002, 16:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:33376] Re: Re: Re: Re: the humbling?, Nomiprins Tue 24 Dec 2002, 16:15 GMT
  - [PEN-L:33390] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the humbling?, Carrol Cox Tue 24 Dec 2002, 21:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:33375] Shakers, Louis Proyect Tue 24 Dec 2002, 15:27 GMT
- [PEN-L:33374] Protesting May Be Good for Your Health, Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 24 Dec 2002, 15:12 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]