[PEN-L:33379] RE: Re: RE: The Economist considers Karl Marx

To: "'pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx '" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PEN-L:33379] RE: Re: RE: The Economist considers Karl Marx
From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:55:16 -0800

Title: RE: [PEN-L:33297] Re: RE: The Economist considers Karl Marx

JKS says:>Well, Southern Cal, that's where all the loose marbles go anyway . . . . Haven't you read Nathaniel West's Day of the Lucust? <

who was it was said that it's as if the whole country had been tipped on its side, so that everything loose fell to California? N. West? I thought it was Frank Lloyd Wright. Bartlett, call your office...

Jim in RI

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:33378] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke)
Next by Date: [PEN-L:33380] RE: Re: The Economicst considers Karl Marx ref # 33 297
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:33378] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke)
Next by thread: [PEN-L:33380] RE: Re: The Economicst considers Karl Marx ref # 33 297
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:33383] Mobile Vulgus: Protest Tools, Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 24 Dec 2002, 19:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:33381] Re: In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke), Ian Murray Tue 24 Dec 2002, 18:13 GMT
  - [PEN-L:33382] Re: Re: In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke), Louis Proyect Tue 24 Dec 2002, 18:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:33380] RE: Re: The Economicst considers Karl Marx ref # 33 297, Devine, James Tue 24 Dec 2002, 18:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:33379] RE: Re: RE: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Devine, James Tue 24 Dec 2002, 17:58 GMT
- [PEN-L:33378] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke), Forstater, Mathew Tue 24 Dec 2002, 17:16 GMT
  - [PEN-L:33422] In Defense of Scrooge (not meant as a joke), Ellen Frank Thu 26 Dec 2002, 16:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:33376] Re: Re: Re: Re: the humbling?, Nomiprins Tue 24 Dec 2002, 16:15 GMT
  - [PEN-L:33390] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the humbling?, Carrol Cox Tue 24 Dec 2002, 21:54 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]