Michael Pollak wrote:
> Hegel must be howling with laughter.
Guiliani as tragedy, Spitzer as farce?
And/or Miiken as creator, Grubman as destroyer.
Doug
- [PEN-L:33343] Re: Re: the humbling?, (continued)
- [PEN-L:33343] Re: Re: the humbling?, Michael Perelman Mon 23 Dec 2002, 15:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:33344] Re: Re: the humbling?, Doug Henwood Mon 23 Dec 2002, 16:09 GMT
- [PEN-L:33345] Re: Re: Re: the humbling?, Ian Murray Mon 23 Dec 2002, 16:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:33350] Re: Re: Re: Re: the humbling?, Michael Pollak Mon 23 Dec 2002, 18:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:33357] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the humbling?, Doug Henwood Mon 23 Dec 2002, 20:51 GMT
- [PEN-L:33338] Venezuela Oil Tanker Unloaded as Strike Support Starts to Slip, Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 23 Dec 2002, 10:09 GMT
- [PEN-L:33337] Re: The ideological implications of Scorcese's latest film, Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 23 Dec 2002, 09:16 GMT
- [PEN-L:33336] New Etiquette, Chris Burford Mon 23 Dec 2002, 09:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:33335] Frist's ideological state apparatus, Chris Burford Mon 23 Dec 2002, 09:01 GMT