PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:33313] Re: Re: muscular economics
Michael, I think that you would find that academic economists on average
are pretty fit. The examples you give are exceptions. My own personal
observations are that you will find a fairly high percentage of academics
tend to spend some time running, swimming, playing racquet sports, etc. --
probably more than the average at their income bracket -- perhaps because
they have more flexible schedules.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 12:40:22AM -0500, Michael Pollak wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> > > Krugman's latest says: The Washington Post reports that one of Mr.
> > > Bush's frequent complaints about Larry Lindsey was that he didn't get
> > > enough physical exercise.
> >
> > Yeah, and an earlier article said he looked "jowly" on TV. In other
> > words, he's fat, but no one wanted to say that. Being fat is pretty much
> > verboten at the upper reaches of U.S. society now.
>
> True, but I think Krugman's delicacy is better interpreted as an
> individual case. One of his very first columns for the NYT contained a
> right down the middle gratuituous fat joke about another recently departed
> administration economist. He wondered about alternative employment
> opportunities for Larry Summers and wondered aloud parethentically
> ("Spokesman for Jenny Craig? Sorry, couldn't help myself"). I think he's
> actually champing at the bit to make fun of fat economists, since all the
> rivals he's most envious of (like everyone who got a job in the Clinton
> administration) are chubbier than he is. (It may be rare among the ruling
> class, but I think roundness, if not always on a Lindsian scale, is
> actually more common that not among middle aged academic economists.) I
> think his allusiveness here stems from a very recent acquisition of a
> veneer rudimentary tactfulness for purposes of ambition. I think he
> really wants a job in the next Dem administration and thinks with the
> success of his column he's actually got a shot. He was reportedly very
> hurt that all his rivals got one in Clinton's but not him. And I heard
> the general opinion was that he was never even considered because all his
> colleagues hated his guts because he was such a rude bastard. And after
> that inaugural column they all jumped up and said See?
>
> Michael
>
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:33294] muscular economics,
Michael Perelman Sat 21 Dec 2002, 03:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:33292] progressive taxation,
Ian Murray Sat 21 Dec 2002, 02:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:33290] The choreography of war,
Chris Burford Sat 21 Dec 2002, 00:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:33289] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: How Much Housing Credit Is Too Much?,
Finmktctr Sat 21 Dec 2002, 00:49 GMT
- [PEN-L:33288] SF IMC Interviews Al Giordano on Venezuela, Etc.,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 21 Dec 2002, 00:38 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]