PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[PEN-L:33308] Re: Re: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx

----- Original Message -----
From: "andie nachgeborenen" <andie_nachgeborenen@xxxxxxxxx>

> It's a logical impossibility. If there's no state, there's no property
or contract law, so no title to anything, and no sanctioned and
enforceable exchanges, so no markets.

================

A most rare and strange zone, where law and logic overlap, no? :-)



>This is a point Cass Sunstein has usefully insisted on over the years.
>
> jks

===================

Is there a richer, non-obvious genealogy of CS' claims I can find out
more about?

Ian
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]