I didn't pry into those 14 columns, but I bet they contain abundant (respectable) sanction for the linguistic acceptability of the proposition that "Markets are natural."
The question is though "Markets are natural to what....?"
Joanna
- [PEN-L:33280] RE: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Devine, James Fri 20 Dec 2002, 21:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:33281] Re: RE: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Ian Murray Fri 20 Dec 2002, 21:46 GMT
- [PEN-L:33282] Re: Re: RE: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Carrol Cox Fri 20 Dec 2002, 21:58 GMT
- [PEN-L:33284] Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Ian Murray Fri 20 Dec 2002, 22:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:33285] Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx, joanna bujes Fri 20 Dec 2002, 22:14 GMT
- [PEN-L:33286] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Doug Henwood Fri 20 Dec 2002, 22:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:33278] RE: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Devine, James Fri 20 Dec 2002, 21:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:33297] Re: RE: The Economist considers Karl Marx, andie nachgeborenen Sat 21 Dec 2002, 05:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:33276] RE: Re: Re: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx, Devine, James Fri 20 Dec 2002, 21:07 GMT