PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:33239] poor pay more
Tonak and Shaikh's work on the social wage might offer some guidelines on
how one could theoretically go about evaluating who gets what from the
government, but a full accounting would be all but impossible.
We all believe that the military does more to protect the assets of the
rich, but quantification would be difficult. Even so, I think that the
idea of trying to quantify the benefit side alongside the tax side might
be interesting.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:33253] Re: Re: Mass arrests of Muslims in LA, (continued)
- [PEN-L:33242] taxation question,
Devine, James Thu 19 Dec 2002, 20:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:33241] RE: Christian Economics, 2,
Devine, James Thu 19 Dec 2002, 20:28 GMT
- [PEN-L:33239] poor pay more,
Michael Perelman Thu 19 Dec 2002, 20:09 GMT
- [PEN-L:33238] blogspeech,
Ian Murray Thu 19 Dec 2002, 19:49 GMT
- [PEN-L:33237] How Much Housing Credit Is Too Much?,
Finmktctr Thu 19 Dec 2002, 19:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:33235] Christian Economics, 2,
enilsson Thu 19 Dec 2002, 18:31 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]