[PEN-L:33198] Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PEN-L:33198] Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:33:45 -0500

Devine, James wrote:

I wasn't saying that they were scum since I didn't finish their
book. Maybe they are, but more likely they're confused (being happy
about being communist and the like).


And "scummy" Negri is still under the care of the Italian state
because they think he's a dangerous revolutionary.

Doug

Follow-Ups:
- [PEN-L:33201] Re: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
  - From: Carrol Cox

References:
- [PEN-L:33197] RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
  - From: Devine, James

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:33197] RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
Next by Date: [PEN-L:33199] downsizing constitutional law
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:33197] RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
Next by thread: [PEN-L:33201] Re: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:33202] job opening, Michael Perelman Thu 19 Dec 2002, 02:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:33200] Re:imperialism vs. Empire., Sabri Oncu Thu 19 Dec 2002, 00:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:33199] downsizing constitutional law, Devine, James Wed 18 Dec 2002, 23:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:33197] RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Devine, James Wed 18 Dec 2002, 23:26 GMT
  - [PEN-L:33198] Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Doug Henwood Wed 18 Dec 2002, 23:34 GMT
    - [PEN-L:33201] Re: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Carrol Cox Thu 19 Dec 2002, 00:49 GMT
- [PEN-L:33195] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Devine, James Wed 18 Dec 2002, 23:00 GMT
  - [PEN-L:33196] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., joanna bujes Wed 18 Dec 2002, 23:10 GMT
- [PEN-L:33193] Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Michael Hoover Wed 18 Dec 2002, 22:37 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]