joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
> >We can be confident that in the long run their real interests will lead
> >global elites to support empire and refuse any project of US imperialism.
this sentence sounds like an assertion of inevitability. I thought that such assertions were totally "out" in this best of all possible postmodern worlds.... and aren't Hardt and Negri postmodern?
Jim
- [PEN-L:33196] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., (continued)
- [PEN-L:33196] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., joanna bujes Wed 18 Dec 2002, 23:10 GMT
- [PEN-L:33193] Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Michael Hoover Wed 18 Dec 2002, 22:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:33191] RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Devine, James Wed 18 Dec 2002, 22:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:33194] Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., e. ahmet tonak Wed 18 Dec 2002, 22:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:33189] RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Devine, James Wed 18 Dec 2002, 22:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:33190] Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Doug Henwood Wed 18 Dec 2002, 22:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:33192] Re: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire., Carrol Cox Wed 18 Dec 2002, 22:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:33187] imperialism vs. Empire., Devine, James Wed 18 Dec 2002, 20:52 GMT
- [PEN-L:33188] Re: imperialism vs. Empire., joanna bujes Wed 18 Dec 2002, 21:58 GMT