Eugene Coyle wrote:
The most persuasive is that the cost of constructing a new house -- if lower than the price of a house -- would prevent a bubble as profitable new construction flooded in to keep the prices from bubbling.
But the market is mainly about existing houses, which are about 80% of the turnover in unit terms. You'd have to build a lot of houses.
Doug
- [PEN-L:33157] Re: FW: housing bubble?, (continued)
- [PEN-L:33157] Re: FW: housing bubble?, Doug Henwood Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:33158] Re: Re: FW: housing bubble?, joanna bujes Tue 17 Dec 2002, 19:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:33161] Re: Re: FW: housing bubble?, Peter Dorman Tue 17 Dec 2002, 20:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:33164] Re: FW: housing bubble?, Eugene Coyle Tue 17 Dec 2002, 22:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:33166] Re: Re: FW: housing bubble?, Doug Henwood Tue 17 Dec 2002, 22:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:33168] Re: Re: Re: FW: housing bubble?, Michael Perelman Tue 17 Dec 2002, 22:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:33155] RE: Military Keynesianism to the rescue, Devine, James Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:49 GMT
- [PEN-L:33154] Venezuelan Army Chief Backs Chavez Amid Strike, Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:46 GMT
- [PEN-L:33153] Who is the thief?, e. ahmet tonak Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:36 GMT