Chris Burford wrote:
Doug, these may be fiddly questions and things can get too detailed, but the present abrupt dismissal of O'Neill suggests a lightening flash in a looming storm, at least as far as Bush is concerned.
W is worried that he'll suffer the same fate as his father - popular war president who loses re-election because the economy sucked. He wants to project concern about the economy, and what better way to do that than with a headline-grabbing shakeup? But as for policy - well it looks like more tax cuts for the upscale, and that's about it.
Doug
- [PEN-L:32861] Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Neill goes, Bono stays, (continued)
- [PEN-L:32861] Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Neill goes, Bono stays, Michael Perelman Sun 08 Dec 2002, 00:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:32879] Re: Neill goes, Bono stays, Carrol Cox Sun 08 Dec 2002, 23:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:32880] Re: Re: Neill goes, Bono stays, Michael Perelman Sun 08 Dec 2002, 23:47 GMT
- [PEN-L:32866] O'Neill and sectors of capitalism, Chris Burford Sun 08 Dec 2002, 10:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:32869] Re: O'Neill and sectors of capitalism, Doug Henwood Sun 08 Dec 2002, 16:27 GMT
- [PEN-L:32877] Re: Re: O'Neill and sectors of capitalism, Michael Perelman Sun 08 Dec 2002, 22:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:32838] globalizing the open source movement, Ian Murray Sat 07 Dec 2002, 04:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:32837] Re: Re: re: Query: ": <?xml:namespace prefix = o, Sabri Oncu Sat 07 Dec 2002, 03:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:32836] Canada & IMF, Hari Kumar Fri 06 Dec 2002, 22:23 GMT