> Chris Burford wrote:
>
> >O'Neill with hindsight looks like the uncomfortable pathetic puppet
> >of finance capital he was.
>
> Doug:
> Eh? Why did Wall Street rally on the announcement of his departure,
> after taking an early morning hit on the weak U.S. employment report?
> They never liked him. It'll be very interesting to see if Bush
> appoints a Wall Street guy to take his place, or another
> industrialist or political bagman instead.
why not go for greatness, appointing another oil man to the job?
Jim
- [PEN-L:32876] Re: Re: Sodexho-Workers-Colleges, (continued)
- [PEN-L:32876] Re: Re: Sodexho-Workers-Colleges, e. ahmet tonak Sun 08 Dec 2002, 21:51 GMT
- [PEN-L:32853] White House Demands Weapons Inspectors Abduct Iraqi Scientists, Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 07 Dec 2002, 19:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:32852] FW: Ditty, Devine, James Sat 07 Dec 2002, 19:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:32850] RE: Sodexho-Workers-Colleges, Devine, James Sat 07 Dec 2002, 18:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:32846] RE: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays, Devine, James Sat 07 Dec 2002, 17:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:32847] Re: RE: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays, Ian Murray Sat 07 Dec 2002, 17:47 GMT
- [PEN-L:32851] Re: Re: RE: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays, Eugene Coyle Sat 07 Dec 2002, 18:55 GMT
- [PEN-L:32849] Re: RE: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays, Doug Henwood Sat 07 Dec 2002, 18:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:32845] Understanding and Reporting on Disability, Doyle Saylor Sat 07 Dec 2002, 16:59 GMT