Eugene Coyle wrote:
Yeah, you have to wonder what the govt agenda is.
The bailout was opposed by the rest of the airline industry. And there was a substantial risk the government wouldn't get its money back. The decision doesn't seem too mysterious.
Doug
- [PEN-L:32783] Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, (continued)
- [PEN-L:32783] Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Dan Scanlan Thu 05 Dec 2002, 18:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:32784] Re: Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Michael Perelman Thu 05 Dec 2002, 18:14 GMT
- [PEN-L:32788] Re: Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Eugene Coyle Thu 05 Dec 2002, 18:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:32789] Re: Re: Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Michael Perelman Thu 05 Dec 2002, 18:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:32795] Re: Re: Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Doug Henwood Thu 05 Dec 2002, 18:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:32796] Re: Re: Re: Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Eugene Coyle Thu 05 Dec 2002, 18:52 GMT
- [PEN-L:32797] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Michael Perelman Thu 05 Dec 2002, 19:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:32798] Re: Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Bill Lear Thu 05 Dec 2002, 19:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:32800] Re: Re: Re: FW: today's papers: Crash Landing?, Louis Proyect Thu 05 Dec 2002, 19:19 GMT