Michael Perelman wrote:
Lou is correct on several points. Brad typically supports neo-liberal policies abroad and, at least to my mind, he is more often than not wrong. Also, the 3 people he mentioned did leave in disgust about Brad's behavior. I thought that it would have been healthier to have dialogued with Brad, but he often did behave arrogantly.
True enough, but it's an odd model of dialogue that will admit only people in fundamental agreement with each other. I guess it's the left version of Richard Feinberg's wonderful comment that democracy only works when there's fundamental agreement on the nature of property.
Doug
- [PEN-L:32701] Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Sabri Oncu Tue 03 Dec 2002, 04:47 GMT
- [PEN-L:32709] Re: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Doug Henwood Tue 03 Dec 2002, 15:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:32713] Re: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Louis Proyect Tue 03 Dec 2002, 16:55 GMT
- [PEN-L:32714] Re: Re: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Michael Perelman Tue 03 Dec 2002, 17:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:32718] Re: Re: Re: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Doug Henwood Tue 03 Dec 2002, 19:23 GMT
- [PEN-L:32725] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Michael Perelman Tue 03 Dec 2002, 22:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:32734] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Carrol Cox Wed 04 Dec 2002, 01:16 GMT
- [PEN-L:32737] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Louis Proyect Wed 04 Dec 2002, 01:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:32719] Re: Re: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial, Ian Murray Tue 03 Dec 2002, 21:11 GMT