As one economist pithily put it, "What it means is that with the benefit
of hindsight, the late `90s never happened."
this quote reveals the blinkered thinking of orthodox economists very well: it simply compares two points in time, before and after the late '90s. It doesn't do what Brenner does, i.e., indicate that the late '90s left the U.S. economy with major imbalances that aren't going to be purged for quite awhile.
Jim
- [PEN-L:31589] pushin' on a string?, Ian Murray Sat 26 Oct 2002, 07:09 GMT
- [PEN-L:31588] RE: "The Late '90s Never Happened", Sabri Oncu Sat 26 Oct 2002, 06:57 GMT
- [PEN-L:31586] Bello on Brenner, Ian Murray Sat 26 Oct 2002, 00:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:31587] Afghanistan one year later, Ian Murray Sat 26 Oct 2002, 00:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:31583] RE: "The Late '90s Never Happened", Devine, James Fri 25 Oct 2002, 20:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:31585] RE: RE: "The Late '90s Never Happened", Max B. Sawicky Fri 25 Oct 2002, 21:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:31582] RE: A Canadian paper gets it right, Devine, James Fri 25 Oct 2002, 20:27 GMT
- [PEN-L:31584] Re: RE: A Canadian paper gets it right, Louis Proyect Fri 25 Oct 2002, 20:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:31594] Re: A Canadian paper gets it right, Charles Jannuzi Sat 26 Oct 2002, 15:10 GMT