|
It's terrifying stuff.
The strategy also includes a chapter called "Ignite a New Era of Global Economic Growth through Free Markets and Free Trade", thus formally uniting militarism with its trade and investment strategies.
Coincidentally I was just watching a strikingly topical episode of the BBC TV series "History of Britain". It was on how the British Empire explicitly used free trade and free markets (with the advantage of course of superior guns and technology, having wiped out large parts of India’s textile industry) accompanied by military suppression to subjugate Ireland and India in the 19th century, leading to rebellion and millions of deaths in famines in both countries. The imperial masters justified it in terms of bringing enlightenment and modern technology to the backward parts of the world.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
>A
senior White House official said Mr. Bush had edited the I don't believe that Dubya read any of this. He's too busy playing video golf and working out. This whole document seems to "cross the Rubicon," transforming the U.S. from a "Republic to an Empire" as Rome did. (That line is from the fascistic Pat Buchanan, whose ideal Republic is white male McCarthyite conservative and Catholic. I am not referencing the recent book by Hardt & Negri.) This is the closest thing I've see to the U.S. declaring itself the World Government. I'm wondering when President Jenna Bush will appoint a horse to the Senate... >Mr.
Clinton's strategy dealt at length with tactics to prevent boy does this guy have a one-track mind! JD
|
- [PEN-L:30446] Bush Militarism- How many Divisions are there in the capitalist class?, Hari Kumar Sun 22 Sep 2002, 13:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:30453] Re: Bush Militarism- How many Divisions are there in the capitalist class?, Michael Perelman Sun 22 Sep 2002, 15:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:30455] Re: Bush Militarism- How many Divisions are there in thecapitalist class?, Carrol Cox Sun 22 Sep 2002, 15:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:30443] RE: Re: RE: RE: Bushist militarism, Bill Rosenberg Sun 22 Sep 2002, 02:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:30441] RE: RE: Bushist militarism, Bill Rosenberg Sun 22 Sep 2002, 02:21 GMT
- [PEN-L:30442] Re: RE: RE: Bushist militarism, Michael Perelman Sun 22 Sep 2002, 02:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:30445] Re: Re: RE: RE: Bushist militarism, Anthony D'Costa Sun 22 Sep 2002, 03:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:30440] RE: Re: corporate poltiical [sic] contributions ove r-rated?, Devine, James Sun 22 Sep 2002, 00:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:30438] corporate poltiical contributions over-rated?, Devine, James Sat 21 Sep 2002, 23:19 GMT