PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:29979] Re: RE: Greenspan at Jackson Hole
RE: [PEN-L:29976] Greenspan at Jackson Hole
----- Original Message -----
From: Devine, James
does he explain why he couldn't fight the stock market bubble using margin requirements or
his own words, so that he didn't need to raise interest rates?
=============
Down in the footnotes:
...the preponderance of research suggests that changes in margins are not an effective
tool for reducing stock market volatility. It is possible that margin requirements inhibit
very small investors whose access to other forms of credit is limited. If so, the only
effect of raised margin requirements is to price out the very small investor without
addressing the broader issue of stock price bubbles.
If a change in margin requirements were taken by investors as a signal that the central
bank would soon tighten monetary policy enough to burst a bubble, then there might be the
appearance of a causal effect. But it is the prospect of monetary policy action, not the
margin increase, that should be viewed as the trigger. In a similar manner, history tells
us that "jawboning" asset markets will be ineffective unless backed by action.
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:29982] Re: Re: planet starbucks,
Carl Remick Fri 30 Aug 2002, 17:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:29981] Coming: the Battle of Cancun,
Ian Murray Fri 30 Aug 2002, 17:15 GMT
- [PEN-L:29980] RE: Re: RE: Greenspan at Jackson Hole,
Davies, Daniel Fri 30 Aug 2002, 16:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:29977] RE: Greenspan at Jackson Hole,
Devine, James Fri 30 Aug 2002, 16:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:29976] Greenspan at Jackson Hole,
Ian Murray Fri 30 Aug 2002, 16:46 GMT
- [PEN-L:29975] WTO -- FSC penalty,
Ian Murray Fri 30 Aug 2002, 16:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:29974] planet starbucks,
Devine, James Fri 30 Aug 2002, 16:36 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]