The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slave of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back.
It always makes me wince to see this quoted over and over. Hasn't the history of ideas methodology had enough ridicule heaped upon it in the last half century of historiography to move beyond this? The Keynesian one-liner seems to have remarkable staying power, despite its untenability, though.
-----Ben
- [PEN-L:29880] RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: utopianism??, Brown, Martin - ARP (NCI) Mon 26 Aug 2002, 19:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:29878] dead economists, Ellen Frank Mon 26 Aug 2002, 19:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:29881] Re: dead economists, Gil Skillman Mon 26 Aug 2002, 19:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:29882] Re: Re: dead economists, Ellen Frank Mon 26 Aug 2002, 19:57 GMT
- Message not available
- [PEN-L:29892] Re: Re: dead economists, Ben Day Tue 27 Aug 2002, 01:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:29876] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: utopianism??, Carl Remick Mon 26 Aug 2002, 18:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:29877] Future Criminals, Eric Nilsson Mon 26 Aug 2002, 18:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:29875] Economic Reporting Review, Dean Baker, 8/26/02, Robert Naiman Mon 26 Aug 2002, 18:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:29872] Oz anti-adultery association, Devine, James Mon 26 Aug 2002, 16:47 GMT