PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:29890] Re: Re: Bushies say NAIRU is 4.9
Arguing about whether the right number is 8.5% or 4.9% or 0.5% is a trap. The
figure for the NAIRU should not be a discussion we enter into.
Gene Coyle
Tom Walker wrote:
> I'll admit as much as "more coherent" or "more systematic" but "more
> scientific?" That's like saying one astrologer is more scientific than
> another.
>
> Jim Devine wrote,
>
> "The NAIRU is a more-scientific way to describe what Milton Friedman calls
> "the natural rate of unemployment." His idea is that the economy gravitates
> toward the natural rate unless the government or central bank screws things
> up.
>
> Tom Walker
> 604 254 0470
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:29909] Re: Re: dead economists, (continued)
- [PEN-L:29893] and when we're all rich, then what?,
Ian Murray Tue 27 Aug 2002, 03:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:29891] art and the commodity form,
Michael Perelman Tue 27 Aug 2002, 01:52 GMT
- [PEN-L:29889] Re: Bushies say NAIRU is 4.9,
Tom Walker Tue 27 Aug 2002, 00:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:29888] post bankruptcy self-dealing,
Michael Perelman Mon 26 Aug 2002, 23:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:29887] RE: Re: Bushies say NAIRU is 4.9,
Devine, James Mon 26 Aug 2002, 22:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:29886] Re: Re: Bushies say NAIRU is 4.9,
Carl Remick Mon 26 Aug 2002, 21:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:29885] Iraq: Cheney's case for preemptive doctrine,
Sabri Oncu Mon 26 Aug 2002, 21:19 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]