From today's SLATE: >The [US-based] Washington Post leads with a
piece saying that Bush administration lawyers "have concluded"
that the president can legally attack Saddam without prior approval
from Congress. The lawyers argue, among other points, that Bush
already has the power to invade from congressional resolutions
adopted prior to Gulf War I. Still, the piece says that some
inside the White House think that Bush should get Congress's
blessing in any case.<
nice of them, don't you think?
JD
- [PEN-L:29871] Re: "participatory democracy", (continued)
- [PEN-L:29871] Re: "participatory democracy", Michael Perelman Mon 26 Aug 2002, 16:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:29863] RE: Re: utopianism??, Devine, James Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:29864] Re: RE: Re: utopianism??, Louis Proyect Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:29865] Re: RE: Re: utopianism??, Michael Perelman Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:29862] the legal war?, Devine, James Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:29860] utopianism??, Devine, James Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:29861] Re: utopianism??, Louis Proyect Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:29859] new subsidies guesstimates, Ian Murray Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:29858] A Mesopotamian Stalingrad?, Louis Proyect Mon 26 Aug 2002, 14:48 GMT