PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:29575] Re: Rumours of war on Iraq
Unfortunately, there is a "conceivable solution to the Palestine question" -
expulsion - which, if Martin van Creveld and others are to be believed, is a
very serious incentive for Israel's support for a war on Iraq. Such support has
indeed been very forthcoming.
As for big-picture strategic goals, I would rather station my Marines in
Baghdad than to take over the Holy Land, should its royal family misbehave (or
be eliminated.) Switch-a-roo, keep the oil.
Thiago Oppermann
On 19/8/02 1:40 AM, "Rob Schaap" <rschaap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm with Michael Pollack on this one. No realistic discernable
> strategic goal. No reliable staging posts. No enduring alliance. No
> conceivable solution to the Palestine question. No decisive good will
> in the region. No hard evidence to defend pretext #1 (Baghdad links to
> al Qaeda), pretext #2 (capacity and intention to deploy weapons of mass
> destruction against 'west'), or the desperately shrill pretext #3
> (Saddam is worse than any other despot in the world and it's worth
> killing tens of thousands of people who aren't Saddam to depose him).
> So what support there is even at home for a unilateral first strike is
> likely a mile wide and an inch deep (even if enough support for
> November, that support would be wider than it is deep, and likely to
> damage 2004 chances).
>
> Anyway, if the attack was to be a full scale November invasion, would
> they not already have to be landing armour, logistics and troops in
> discernable quantities?
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
>
> Michael Pollak wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Michael Perelman wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect that the war is directed at the Nov. elections.
>>
>> Michael, if it will cheer you up, I'll bet you there's no war before the
>> elections. In fact I'll give you 2 to 1. And if you'll give me 2 to 1,
>> I'll bet you they will be no war in next 365 days.
>>
>> Michael
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: www-mail.usyd.edu.au
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:29587] Re: Re: Stiglitz, (continued)
- [PEN-L:29581] Foucault = ?,
Jurriaan Bendien Sun 18 Aug 2002, 19:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:29579] Re: Foucault = ?,
Jurriaan Bendien Sun 18 Aug 2002, 18:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:29576] US opposition to Iraq's chemical weapons just so much gas,
ken hanly Sun 18 Aug 2002, 17:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:29575] Re: Rumours of war on Iraq,
topp8564 Sun 18 Aug 2002, 16:58 GMT
- [PEN-L:29574] war/election bet,
Devine, James Sun 18 Aug 2002, 16:55 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]