I wrote:
> So the "solution" to the undertow created new problems,
> new imbalances, with which we are still living. I think
> they'll keep the U.S. down for quite awhile, even without
> a double dip, unless of course there's a major war.
Sabri asks:
Do you think a war in Iraq, if it happens, is major enough to
save the US? Or, do you have something bigger than that in mind?
me: this kind of thing can't be predicted. My guess is that if the war is big enough to provide sufficient Keynesian stimulus, it will be a bloody hell-hole (nor just for the Iraqis) like the US war against Vietnam. On the other hand, if it's a short sharp shock like the war against Afghanistan, it's likely to provide much stimulus.
Again, we should go back to the (mostly mythical, I admit) old Roman habit under which emperors named themselves after their victories: Ronald Grenadicus, George Iraqicus, Bill Serbicus, George Afghanicus.
JD
- [PEN-L:29580] RE: Re: war/election bet, (continued)
- [PEN-L:29580] RE: Re: war/election bet, Max B. Sawicky Sun 18 Aug 2002, 19:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:29584] Re: RE: Re: war/election bet, Michael Perelman Sun 18 Aug 2002, 21:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:29573] RE: Re: production & realization, Devine, James Sun 18 Aug 2002, 16:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:29572] RE: production & realization, Devine, James Sun 18 Aug 2002, 16:23 GMT
- [PEN-L:29571] RE: Re: production & realization, Devine, James Sun 18 Aug 2002, 16:16 GMT
- [PEN-L:29569] Free David Soskice, Ian Murray Sun 18 Aug 2002, 15:49 GMT
- [PEN-L:29566] What is Indonesia?, Louis Proyect Sun 18 Aug 2002, 14:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:29567] "Maquila work is marked for extinction", Louis Proyect Sun 18 Aug 2002, 15:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:29565] Cold feet over Iraq, Louis Proyect Sun 18 Aug 2002, 14:02 GMT