Eh, I wasn't implying assent to the perspective of the article - and certainly not to the Right to Work defense fund's anti-union crusade - by forwarding it. It's just the only in-depth description of the charges I've been able to find, and this is pretty significant news IMO.
-----Ben
At 08:48 PM 8/13/2002 -0700, Devine, James wrote:
is NATIONAL REVIEW -- a right-wing McCarthyite rag -- a reliable source? is the National Right to Work group -- an anti-union organization -- someone to trust?
Jim
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Day To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 8/13/2002 8:37 PM Subject: [PEN-L:29426] "Big Labor?s Enron"
August 13, 2002, 8:45 a.m. Big Labor's Enron by Joel Mowbray for National Review Online
- [PEN-L:29434] Re: Re: Re: My views on Stalin, (continued)
- [PEN-L:29434] Re: Re: Re: My views on Stalin, Michael Perelman Wed 14 Aug 2002, 14:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:29435] Re: Re: Re: Re: My views on Stalin, Shane Mage Wed 14 Aug 2002, 14:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:29427] RE: "Big Labor?s Enron", Devine, James Wed 14 Aug 2002, 03:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:29428] Re: RE: "Big Labor?s Enron", Michael Perelman Wed 14 Aug 2002, 03:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:29429] Re: RE: "Big Labor?s Enron", Ben Day Wed 14 Aug 2002, 05:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:29426] "Big Labor?s Enron", Ben Day Wed 14 Aug 2002, 03:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:29425] underemployment?, Ian Murray Wed 14 Aug 2002, 02:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:29423] Moon within our reach Isro, Ulhas Joglekar Wed 14 Aug 2002, 00:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:29422] Re: Backlash in Saudi Arabia, ken hanly Wed 14 Aug 2002, 00:19 GMT