[PEN-L:29387] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PEN-L:29387] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
From: Gar Lipow <lipowg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:38:03 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020618 Netscape/7.0b1

The actual law was that the first person to bring up "Hitler" was
automatically the loser of the debate. Since no one mentioned Stalin
until LP brought it up, does that mean this applies to him?

Michael Perelman wrote:

Someone once proposed -- I think they pronounce it a law -- that once the
word Hitler appears in the debate all dialogue is finished.  If that idea
is a law, a Stalin corollary is warranted.

References:
- [PEN-L:29366] Stalinophobia
  - From: Justin Schwartz
- [PEN-L:29369] Re: Stalinophobia
  - From: Michael Perelman
- [PEN-L:29370] Re: Re: Stalinophobia
  - From: Gar Lipow
- [PEN-L:29380] Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
  - From: Carrol Cox
- [PEN-L:29381] Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
  - From: Michael Perelman

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:29386] Re: New Zealand election
Next by Date: [PEN-L:29388] Re: Re: Re: Max Elbaum To Speak In Sacramento On SocialMovement...
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:29382] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
Next by thread: [PEN-L:29392] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:29370] Re: Re: Stalinophobia, (continued)
- [PEN-L:29364] learning from history, Devine, James Mon 12 Aug 2002, 20:01 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]