PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:28711] Re: Expertise
A book about Chinese health care, Away with all pests, describes how
cleaning people contributed to Chinese medicine in dialogue with the
doctors ...
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
> Yoshie, you should get back to work.
>
> >>1) The straw men: Democray in this context does not mean that everybody
> >>votes on the details of "how you run your shop". It does mean (and
> >>Schweickart agrees) that everybody in your shop gets a vote. That is the
> >>in a hospital, not only doctors, but nurses, Xray techs, receptionists,
> >>floor sweepers, nutritionists, cooks all get an equal say in running the
> >>place - whether via direct democracy, the election of a council, or the
> >>choice of a manager answerable to an elected council. And democracy also
> >>demands that priorities in terms of how capital is allocated also are set
> >>democratically.
>
> As you know I support worker self-management. I am not sure that that has to
> mean that the cleaning staff gets an equal say with regard to the way the
> surgeons do their work, that's the same problem as the problem of the demos
> that I mentioned. I assume that self-managed enterprises can work that sort
> of thing out in an appropriate manner.
>
> >>
> >>2) Secondly, for the most part expertise does not mean a right of decision
> >>making, but a right to advise. For example if I go to my doctor and she
> >>recommends an operation, she has no right to order me to have that
> >>operation, I can refuse, and if the doctor knows what she is doing suffer
> >>or die as a result. But the point is that choice is mine; the doctor's
> >>expertise gives her only a right to advise, not to order. As lawyer, you
> >>should be all to well aware that the same is true for lawyers.
>
> Depends. For doctorss and lawyers that is true. But I was not talking about
> the right of experts to make decisions, but to give their advice, and act on
> it if it accepted--that is, to to their jobs--without unhelpful intrusion by
> the ignorant. There are experts whose job it is to make decisions, not give
> advice, as well. Teachers come to mind as an instance, as well as all sorts
> of govt officials--judges are another. That's why we call them judghes and
> let the end their opinions with the words, Enter Order.
>
> jks
>
> jks
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:28716] [Fwd: Corporate Phantoms],
Carrol Cox Sun 28 Jul 2002, 19:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:28713] Amartya Sen on the dangers of "a little bit of equity" Re: Vandana Shiva,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 28 Jul 2002, 17:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:28712] Re: Expertise,
Devine, James Sun 28 Jul 2002, 17:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:28710] Expertise,
Justin Schwartz Sun 28 Jul 2002, 16:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:28709] Expertise,
Justin Schwartz Sun 28 Jul 2002, 16:02 GMT
- [PEN-L:28706] Broken System? Tweak It, They Say,
Seth Sandronsky Sun 28 Jul 2002, 14:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:28705] Post9/11 'Screw-up of economy"?,
Hari Kumar Sun 28 Jul 2002, 13:58 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]