[PEN-L:28681] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PEN-L:28681] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 12:20:30 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

The Wall Street Journal article does not say that the grinder represented
particularly modern technology; nor was it a commercial product.  I think
most people would regarded as an example of appropriate technology.
 --
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- [PEN-L:28685] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
  - From: Doug Henwood

References:
- [PEN-L:28619] Drudgery
  - From: Michael Perelman
- [PEN-L:28621] Re: Drudgery
  - From: joanna bujes
- [PEN-L:28624] Re: Re: Drudgery
  - From: Michael Perelman
- [PEN-L:28668] Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
  - From: Doug Henwood

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:28680] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
Next by Date: [PEN-L:28682] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:28668] Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
Next by thread: [PEN-L:28685] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:28619] Drudgery, Michael Perelman Fri 26 Jul 2002, 22:15 GMT
  - [PEN-L:28621] Re: Drudgery, joanna bujes Fri 26 Jul 2002, 22:34 GMT
    - [PEN-L:28624] Re: Re: Drudgery, Michael Perelman Fri 26 Jul 2002, 22:41 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:28668] Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Doug Henwood Sat 27 Jul 2002, 17:33 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:28681] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Michael Perelman Sat 27 Jul 2002, 19:22 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:28685] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Doug Henwood Sat 27 Jul 2002, 20:20 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:28686] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Michael Perelman Sat 27 Jul 2002, 20:38 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:28719] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, joanna bujes Sun 28 Jul 2002, 21:08 GMT
    - [PEN-L:28625] Re: Re: Drudgery, Gil Skillman Fri 26 Jul 2002, 22:52 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]