PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:28645] Re: Re: Re: Vandana Shiva
Doug Henwood wrote:
> I completely agree with that. But to do all these things, you need
> more industry, and more industry means transforming the division of
> labor and socializing production now done in the household. You can
> do the good things that Kerala did, but Kerala is still poor. The
> only way to make India less poor is to industrialize somehow. I don't
> think Shiva, or her fans in the West, agree.
I agree with this. But I think India needs at a century of sustained eonomic
growth to abolish mass poverty. Consider China. Despite China's high growth
rate, almost 20% of China's population (or 250 million people) survive on
less than 1 $ a day. The rest live on $ 2 a day.This after 50 years of
"socialism". It will take sustained economic development over a long period
to abolish poverty in China, India and Indonesia.
Ulhas
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:28673] Re: Vandana Shiva, (continued)
- [PEN-L:28656] Re: Re: Vandana Shiva,
ravi Sat 27 Jul 2002, 13:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:28645] Re: Re: Re: Vandana Shiva,
Ulhas Joglekar Sat 27 Jul 2002, 02:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:28702] Re: Kerala (was Re: Vandana Shiva),
Ben Day Sun 28 Jul 2002, 06:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:28707] Re: Re: Kerala (was Re: Vandana Shiva),
ken hanly Sun 28 Jul 2002, 14:47 GMT
- [PEN-L:28714] Re: Re: Kerala (was Re: Vandana Shiva),
Ulhas Joglekar Sun 28 Jul 2002, 17:46 GMT
- [PEN-L:28715] Re: Kerala,
Michael Pollak Sun 28 Jul 2002, 19:14 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]