PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:28640] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
----- Original Message -----
From: Waistline2@xxxxxxx
To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 5:53 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:28636] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery
In a message dated 7/26/02 5:03:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, cbcox@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
> The strongest objections to democratizing technology come from experts who fear the loss of their
> hardwon freedom from lay interference.
This part is simply absurd! It's the software engineers, not Bill Gates
et al who keep Microsoft undemocratic?
It is worth remarking on this occasion that in May 68 in France the
_last_ workforce to abandon the premises they were occupying were the
staffs of TV stations.
Carrol
Tragic thinking devoid of property relations.
Try standup comedy.
=====================
Actually Feenberg, coming from a Marxian-Marcusian-Heideggerian standpoint pays a lot of attention
to May 68 as well as address property relations. But you'd have to actually read his books to see
that.
Ian
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:28638] another question,
Michael Perelman Sat 27 Jul 2002, 01:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:28637] Dems. cave-in turns to avalanche,
Michael Perelman Sat 27 Jul 2002, 01:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:28636] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery,
Waistline2 Sat 27 Jul 2002, 00:55 GMT
- [PEN-L:28635] splitting GE Capital,
Ian Murray Sat 27 Jul 2002, 00:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:28634] Re: quick question,
enilsson Sat 27 Jul 2002, 00:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]