The Wall Street Journal today had a front page story about women in Mali, whose use of mechanized grinding machines has given them time to improve their lives and become literate.
What's the point of this? Did the cotton gin enable slaves to improve their lives and become literate? The application of machines to work is a complex issue, let's treat it that way.
As I read Michael's post, the point was that Mali women's use of mechanized grinding machines has given them time to improve their lives and become literate. No attempt to draw more general conclusions about the social consequences of machinery, or to minimize the complexity of this issue, was made. Indeed, in light of well-known instances of less progressive applications of machinery to work (e.g., the role of the cotton gin in US slavery), this item serves if anything to highlight the complexity of the issue.
- [PEN-L:28681] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, (continued)
- [PEN-L:28681] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Michael Perelman Sat 27 Jul 2002, 19:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:28685] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Doug Henwood Sat 27 Jul 2002, 20:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:28686] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Michael Perelman Sat 27 Jul 2002, 20:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:28719] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, joanna bujes Sun 28 Jul 2002, 21:08 GMT
- [PEN-L:28625] Re: Re: Drudgery, Gil Skillman Fri 26 Jul 2002, 22:52 GMT
- [PEN-L:28626] Re: Re: Drudgery, Ian Murray Fri 26 Jul 2002, 22:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:28630] Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Carrol Cox Sat 27 Jul 2002, 00:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:28633] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, Ian Murray Sat 27 Jul 2002, 00:14 GMT
- [PEN-L:28680] Re: Re: Re: Re: Drudgery, joanna bujes Sat 27 Jul 2002, 19:17 GMT