PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:28577] Re: RE: Re: rejecting a school
I don't understand the physics, but wasn't Newtonian physics transcended
long before post-structuralism (by Einstein, a socialist, for one)? I'm not
convinced by Irigarary that the _particular_ obstacle to better physics was
masculinity, but in any case, I don't see how the _general_ point about the
social construction of science and the rejection of pretensions to
objectivity is a (new) achievement. Engels discussed flows in _Dialectics
of Nature_, and Marx's _Capital_ is all about bourgeois objectivity.
Bill
> Can someone name the main achievement of one author who has been
> dubbed "post-structuralist"?
the lads at http://www.adequacy.org had a go at claiming that Luce Irigaray
anticipated Stephen Wolfram's "New Kind of Science": (I have added a couple
of question marks to words which do not get through my firewall)
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:28573] Re: the great bet, (continued)
- [PEN-L:28553] RE: RE: Baker and Kar on SS,
Forstater, Mathew Fri 26 Jul 2002, 16:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:28550] Re: Re: rejecting a school,
Bill Burgess Fri 26 Jul 2002, 16:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:28549] RE: Re: rejecting a school,
Davies, Daniel Fri 26 Jul 2002, 16:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:28548] Re: Re: Conclusion: Reformism and what Marx stated,
Waistline2 Fri 26 Jul 2002, 16:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:28544] RE: Re: rejecting a school,
Devine, James Fri 26 Jul 2002, 16:08 GMT
- [PEN-L:28537] Re: rejecting a school,
christian11 Fri 26 Jul 2002, 15:11 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]