PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:28403] Re: Humans wired to cooperate
At 23/07/02 09:14 -0400, Diane Monaco :
NY Times
July 23, 2002
Why We're So Nice: We're Wired to Cooperate
By NATALIE ANGIER
Scientists have no trouble explaining the evolution of competitive
behavior. But the depth and breadth of human altruism, the willingness
to forgo immediate personal gain for the long-term common good, far
exceeds behaviors seen even in other large-brained highly social
species like chimpanzees and dolphins, and it has as such been
difficult to understand.
Assuming that the urge to cooperate is to some extent innate among
humans and reinforced by the brain's feel-good circuitry, the question
of why it arose remains unclear. Anthropologists have speculated that
it took teamwork for humanity's ancestors to hunt large game or gather
difficult plant foods or rear difficult children. So the capacity to
cooperate conferred a survival advantage on our forebears.
Yet as with any other trait, the willingness to abide by the golden
rule and to be a good citizen and not cheat and steal from one's
neighbors is not uniformly distributed.
"If we put some C.E.O.'s in here, I'd like to see how they respond,"
Dr. Kilts said. "Maybe they wouldn't find a positive social
interaction rewarding at all."
The longer "evolutionary psychology" remains in fashion, the less arbitrary
is the overall effect. These subtler experiments use the model to give
attention to features that are not prominent in the linear model of human
ascent favoured at the height of rising capitalist.
The need for cooperation is not at all surprising when you consider, as in
other recent articles, that human beings were probably just as much likely
to be hunted as hunters as the forests retreated in Africa. The great
majority of humanoid lines in fact died out.
In economic terms one of the most important features of the means of
production is often the role it gives to greater human cooperation. That is
quite consistent with marxism.
That is why there is a contradiction between individualistic CEO's and the
complex cooperative social activity of modern economic enterprises.
That is why even capitalism will have to find ways of controlling their
unpredictable and destabilising behaviour. It is costing billions of
dollars at this moment of time.
Chris Burford
Lodnon
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:28336] Re: bankruptcy rate,
Waistline2 Tue 23 Jul 2002, 13:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:28335] Re: Consumer Credit Card Debt,
Waistline2 Tue 23 Jul 2002, 13:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:28334] New Video on the Steady State Revolution,
Diane Monaco Tue 23 Jul 2002, 13:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:28333] Humans wired to cooperate,
Diane Monaco Tue 23 Jul 2002, 13:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:28332] Re: Re: positional goods,
Waistline2 Tue 23 Jul 2002, 13:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:28331] Re: Re: reformism,
Waistline2 Tue 23 Jul 2002, 13:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:28330] Re: reformism,
Waistline2 Tue 23 Jul 2002, 12:51 GMT
- [PEN-L:28329] The new EU,
Louis Proyect Tue 23 Jul 2002, 12:48 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]