> >I am sorry that my initial question on market socialism made Justin
> >Schwartz leave the mail group. I didn't want that.
> >
> It didn't. I've been busy. I _do_ resent Michael P's telling
> to meto shut up
> because I have nothing new to say, unlike all the other
> sparklingly original
> ideas one finds on the list by others and on other topics
> every day. jks
is there really such a thing as an "original idea"?
JD
- [PEN-L:28398] Re: Re: Yale men, (continued)
- [PEN-L:28398] Re: Re: Yale men, Eugene Coyle Tue 23 Jul 2002, 22:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:28366] Re: Yale men, Doug Henwood Tue 23 Jul 2002, 17:28 GMT
- [PEN-L:28357] progressive Archbishop of C anterbur y, Justin Schwartz Tue 23 Jul 2002, 15:45 GMT
- [PEN-L:28356] Re: RE: Re: Reformism V Revolutionary Methods, Justin Schwartz Tue 23 Jul 2002, 15:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:28355] RE: Re: Reformism V Revolutionary Methods, Devine, James Tue 23 Jul 2002, 15:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:28358] Re: RE: Re: Reformism V Revolutionary Methods, Eugene Coyle Tue 23 Jul 2002, 16:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:28362] Re: Re: RE: Re: Reformism V Revolutionary Methods, Ian Murray Tue 23 Jul 2002, 17:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:28390] Reformism V Revolutionary Methods, Ian Murray Tue 23 Jul 2002, 21:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:28354] RE: Re: progressive Archbishop of Canterbury, Devine, James Tue 23 Jul 2002, 15:33 GMT