[PEN-L:28331] Re: Re: reformism

[Waistline2@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 7/22/02 10:14:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:


> I am not arguing against reforms, but "reformism" is a difficult path.
> There is a strong groundswell for reforming corporate finance, just as
> there was for campaign finance reform.  The final reforms are usually very
> unsatisfactory, often designed to quell the immediate call for reform and
> little else, unless there is an organized force demanding reforms.


Reply

Yea, because the world keeps changing faster and in front of our understanding of that, which has "fu**ed" around and changed again.

Miyachi Tatsuo "be" messing with my head attempting to navigate a course based on a fundamental analysis of the mode of exchange and accumulation as distinct from the changes in the mode of production.

During this period of flux reformism is a difficult path because we have not pass this way before.

There is a saying that a camel is a horse made by committee. Democracy is the committee system. My way is your way and that of a million others. Reformulation is a most difficult path because "I" - me in my individuality, have the right way and you impose your right way on my correct way. And I cannot stop you.

I used to read literature from an "anti-competition group" who had mathematical model to disprove competition amongst the human species. This was during the "New Age" period but they probably still exist. It was a bunch of professors that made a hell of a lot of sense. I hope all of them did not become stock brokers because today "their ass is out."

Reform versus Revolution is so tired.

Melvin P.