PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:28220] derivatives redux
How could things get worse? For an answer, consult the annual report of the Bank for
International Settlements, issued this month. Under a section entitled "Seeds of
Concern," the BIS notes that financial consolidation has meant that just a few giant
banks now control the unregulated market for financial derivatives. The top three
banks controlled 89 percent of foreign-exchange derivatives booked by U.S. banks in
2001, up from 59 percent in 1995; the top three banks' share of U.S. interest-rate
derivatives rose to 86 percent in 2001 from 56 percent in 1995; the top three's share
of credit derivatives rose to 94 percent in 2001 from 79 percent in 1998.
In laymen's language, that means that, with fewer and fewer big banks, a failure by
any one of them could be disastrous. That's one of the problems with globalization --
it puts everyone's eggs in the same few baskets.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28798-2002Jul18.html
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:28233] Re: RE: 2nd Law gone?, (continued)
- [PEN-L:28229] 2nd Law gone?,
Ian Murray Sat 20 Jul 2002, 00:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:28223] RE: derivatives redux,
Devine, James Fri 19 Jul 2002, 21:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:28222] RE: query,
Devine, James Fri 19 Jul 2002, 21:28 GMT
- [PEN-L:28220] derivatives redux,
Ian Murray Fri 19 Jul 2002, 21:23 GMT
- [PEN-L:28219] RE: Re: query,
Devine, James Fri 19 Jul 2002, 21:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:28218] query,
Jurriaan Bendien Fri 19 Jul 2002, 21:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:28216] pop quiz,
Ian Murray Fri 19 Jul 2002, 20:53 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]