Michael Hoover says:> limitations of/problems with polling are numerous enough to raise questions about them on various counts (not least of which is polling 'industry' itself)...<
doesn't this suggest that we treat polls the way we treat _all_ information, i.e., criticially, skeptically, while not rejecting them out of hand? Put in the right context and interpreted carefully, poll information can be useful.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- [PEN-L:28166] RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: big biz vs. big govt, Devine, James Thu 18 Jul 2002, 18:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:28165] Re: RE: Re: Re: big biz vs. big govt, Michael Hoover Thu 18 Jul 2002, 17:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:28163] Re: Re: big biz vs. big govt, Waistline2 Thu 18 Jul 2002, 17:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:28184] Re: big biz vs. big govt, Chris Burford Fri 19 Jul 2002, 08:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:28161] RE: Re: Re: big biz vs. big govt, Devine, James Thu 18 Jul 2002, 16:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:28160] Re: Re: big biz vs. big govt, Michael Hoover Thu 18 Jul 2002, 16:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:28159] [conlee@chonnam.ac.kr: [OPE-L:7426] A Marxian Economist urgently wanted as an invited professor], Michael Perelman Thu 18 Jul 2002, 15:46 GMT
- [PEN-L:28158] Re: big biz vs. big govt, Michael Hoover Thu 18 Jul 2002, 15:09 GMT
- [PEN-L:28156] Re: do recessions have a good side?, Tom Walker Thu 18 Jul 2002, 14:41 GMT